The Dilemma Facing Science
What we currently perceive to be the laws of nature
allows us to follow the evolution of the universe back to its beginning, a moment
some 10 to 20 billion years ago when the universe was infinitely hot and dense.
However, our understanding of this moment is incomplete, for we question the
applicability of these laws at extreme temperature and density. Since we cannot
describe that initial condition, we cannot be certain such a moment even existed.
At present, science can only describe the initial conditions of the universe at a
time one trillionth of a second following the moment of infinite temperature, a point
when the universe first began to expand. The observations we make have yet to allow
us a look past the moment at which the expansion began.
"All physical theories... ought to lend themselves to so simple a description that even a child could understand them."
-- Albert Einstein
Science attempts to explain anything we observe in terms of scientific principles that
are in turn explained by deeper principles. Following this chain of explanations, we
are led to laws of nature that cannot be explained within the boundaries of
contemporary science. If science is to fully explain that which it seeks to explain,
then the boundaries of science must change. If it does not, science, even at its
best, will always remain incomplete.
Although current science does not understand the cause behind the creation of the
universe, one thing is for certain. Whatever that cause is, its ESSENCE must
underlie all phenomena of the universe. This statement needs no argument. It is
self-evident. Since that is the case, then it is up to us to take the steps necessary
in becoming conscious enough to observe that essence.
The Deepest Principle needs no explanation.
It is its own Explanation.
What gives rise to...
- ...the Grand Unification theory that unites the electromagnetic with the weak nuclear force?
- ...Quantum Mechanics and the applications of the quantum field theories?
- ...the Standard Model?
+ The Law of Attraction -
But what underlies
the Law of Attraction?
The Laws of Nature as science understands them today, take us back to the beginning when the universe was...
I N F I N I T E L Y
10 to 20 billion years ago.
Science states that the initial condition of the universe at its beginning was a
nominal moment of infinite temperature, the moment at which the Big Bang occurred.
However, science can only describe the initial conditions of the universe at a time
10 -12 second following that moment.
This is when the universe began to expand, and no objective observation we have made
allows us to look beyond the point of expansion. Is there a method by which we can
observe this finite moment of infinite heat and density? The answer is yes, for the
key in making this observation is not in objective observation, but in subjective
"As a child, he would lay in bed at night, stare up into the darkness, and wonder what it would be like if there were nothing."
This is how science must evolve itself if it is to address this mystery of mysteries.
The universe we live in is both subjective and objective, and subjective observation
is just as valid as objective observation simply by virtue of its existence. The
essence that underlies subjective observation is the same as that which underlies
objective observation. It derives its existence from the same source as objective
The attitude of contemporary science towards subjective observation is a self-imposed
limitation (albeit unconsciously) that must change if science is to fully understand
the issues of life, evolution, and being. The reluctance of science to utilize
subjective observation is understandable, however, since subjective observation is
easily distorted by judgements, opinions, and bias. Nevertheless, subjective
observation, unobscured by sentiment, predilection, or partiality, can provide
answers which objective observation can't even hope to provide. If science is to
uncover the solutions it seeks, it must reconcile itself with subjective observation.
Otherwise, it is hopelessly doomed to a mundane fate of half the story.
A Subjective Examination...
Measurement is Observation which can be Objective or Subjective.
Prior to 10 -12 second is the nominal moment of Infinite Temperature
generated by Infinite Vibration.
Science states that on the other side of the finite second and infinite temperature
Science states that on this side (our side, the manifest side) of the finite
second and infinite temperature are All Probabilities.
The Summum Philosophy states, "NOTHING and POSSIBILITY come in and out of bond
infinite times within a finite moment," producing the event of creation.
The breaking and bonding of NOTHING and POSSIBILITY infinite times within the finite
moment produces infinite vibration. This intense vibration manifests as infinite
heat -- hence, the nominal moment of infinite temperature. The result is the Big Bang
and the creation of a universe.
The renowned physicist, Stephen Hawking, theorizes that the universe spontaneously created itself out of nothing.
The Divine Proportion
The Summum Philosophy goes on to say,
"NOTHING and POSSIBILITY come in and out of bond infinite times in a
finite moment. Yet it is impossible for two things to join in harmony or discord
without the presence of a third, for a `BOND' must exist to unite them, and this
`BOND' is `OBJECTIVELY OBSERVED' in its relation to PROPORTION."
proportion, n. a part, share, portion especially in its relation to
the whole; relation between things.
Syn. correlation, correspondence, relationship, balance, harmony, symmetry
The Influence of Proportion
In the field of science, the newest and most promising solution to mysteries of
cosmology and the creation of the universe is the:
Which explains that one-dimensional objects called strings exist in various modes
These differing modes of vibration explain gravitation and a menu of fields similar
to that of the Standard Model.
Each string (mode of vibration) is a proportional effect of the bond between NOTHING
~ String Proportions ~
At the beginning, the particles that constitute matter were created. For reasons unknown to
science, there was an imbalance between particles and anti-particles.
An excess of electrons over positrons, protons over anti-protons, quarks over anti-quarks, ultimately
led to the formation of material out of which life would arise. Had they been created
equally, they would have annihilated each other and we are back to...
Matter + Anti-Matter = N o t h i n g
- The Summum Bonum states there is more possibility than there is nothing.
Observation, whether it is objective or subjective, direct or indirect, is
a process of Attention.
According to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics:
When we measure (Observation or Attention) any quantity, we
are intervening in a way that causes a change.
In other words...
When one state of being observes another, an automatic
inter-relationship is created between the two.
Where your attention is, is where you are,
for you are your attention.
Class... Pay Attention!!
To summarize, Nothing and Possibility...
- ...automatically create each other.
- ...are in automatic bond with each other.
- ...are in automatic observation of each other.
- ...have a relationship that is objectively observed in its relation to proportion.
This is the Deepest Principle. It is the essence that underlies the Law of
Attraction. This is the source of observation. It is understood through subjective
observation. It transcends objective observation.
The Search for a Unified View...
As much as science yearns for a unified view of nature, it keeps encountering a
stubborn duality in the role of intelligent life -- as both subject and student
-- as part of the universe we seek to explain, and as the explainer -- as the
observer, and that which we observe. Even at the deepest levels of modern physics,
duality presents itself. Science must realize duality is the unified view
of nature. After reading this, you should have an idea why.
...and the Duality of Nature.