The Dilemma Facing Science

---

What we currently perceive to be the laws of nature allows us to follow the evolution of the universe back to its beginning, a moment some 10 to 20 billion years ago when the universe was infinitely hot and dense. However, our understanding of this moment is incomplete, for we question the applicability of these laws at extreme temperature and density. Since we cannot describe that initial condition, we cannot be certain such a moment even existed. At present, science can only describe the initial conditions of the universe at a time one trillionth of a second following the moment of infinite temperature, a point when the universe first began to expand. The observations we make have yet to allow us a look past the moment at which the expansion began.

Science attempts to explain anything we observe in terms of scientific principles that are in turn explained by deeper principles. Following this chain of explanations, we are led to laws of nature that cannot be explained within the boundaries of contemporary science. If science is to fully explain that which it seeks to explain, then the boundaries of science must change. If it does not, science, even at its best, will always remain incomplete.

Although current science does not understand the cause behind the creation of the universe, one thing is for certain. Whatever that cause is, its ESSENCE must underlie all phenomena of the universe. This statement needs no argument. It is self-evident. Since that is the case, then it is up to us to take the steps necessary in becoming conscious enough to observe that essence.

The Deepest Principle needs no explanation.

It is its own Explanation.

What gives rise to...

• the Grand Unification theory that unites the electromagnetic with the weak nuclear force?
• Quantum Mechanics and the applications of the quantum field theories?
• the Standard Model?
• Gravity?

+ The Law of Attraction -

But what underlies
the Law of Attraction?

The Laws of Nature as science understands them today, take us back to the beginning when the universe was...

I N F I N I T E L Y

10 to 20 billion years ago.

Science states that the initial condition of the universe at its beginning was a nominal moment of infinite temperature, the moment at which the Big Bang occurred. However, science can only describe the initial conditions of the universe at a time 10 ^-12 second following that moment. This is when the universe began to expand, and no objective observation we have made allows us to look beyond the point of expansion. Is there a method by which we can observe this finite moment of infinite heat and density? The answer is yes, for the key in making this observation is not in objective observation, but in subjective observation.

This is how science must evolve itself if it is to address this mystery of mysteries. The universe we live in is both subjective and objective, and subjective observation is just as valid as objective observation simply by virtue of its existence. The essence that underlies subjective observation is the same as that which underlies objective observation. It derives its existence from the same source as objective observation.

The attitude of contemporary science towards subjective observation is a self-imposed limitation (albeit unconsciously) that must change if science is to fully understand the issues of life, evolution, and being. The reluctance of science to utilize subjective observation is understandable, however, since subjective observation is easily distorted by judgements, opinions, and bias. Nevertheless, subjective observation, unobscured by sentiment, predilection, or partiality, can provide answers which objective observation can't even hope to provide. If science is to uncover the solutions it seeks, it must reconcile itself with subjective observation. Otherwise, it is hopelessly doomed to a mundane fate of half the story.

A Subjective Examination...

Measurement is Observation which can be Objective or Subjective.

Prior to 10 ^-12 second is the nominal moment of Infinite Temperature generated by Infinite Vibration.

The Summum Philosophy states, "NOTHING and POSSIBILITY come in and out of bond infinite times within a finite moment," producing the event of creation.

The breaking and bonding of NOTHING and POSSIBILITY infinite times within the finite moment produces infinite vibration. This intense vibration manifests as infinite heat -- hence, the nominal moment of infinite temperature. The result is the Big Bang and the creation of a universe.

Rumor had it that Stephen Hawking, the renowned physicist, was working on a theory that would explain how the universe came from nothing.

The Summum Philosophy goes on to say,

"NOTHING and POSSIBILITY come in and out of bond infinite times in a finite moment. Yet it is impossible for two things to join in harmony or discord without the presence of a third, for a `BOND' must exist to unite them, and this `BOND' is `OBJECTIVELY OBSERVED' in its relation to PROPORTION."

proportion, n. a part, share, portion especially in its relation to the whole; relation between things.
Syn. correlation, correspondence, relationship, balance, harmony, symmetry

Observation, whether it is objective or subjective, direct or indirect, is a process of Attention.

According to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics:

When we measure (Observation or Attention) any quantity, we are intervening in a way that causes a change.

In other words...

When one state of being observes another, an automatic inter-relationship is created between the two.

To summarize, Nothing and Possibility...

1. automatically create each other.
2. are in automatic bond with each other.
3. are in automatic observation of each other.
4. have a relationship that is objectively observed in its relation to proportion.

This is the Deepest Principle. It is the essence that underlies the Law of Attraction. This is the source of observation. It is understood through subjective observation. It transcends objective observation.